Posts Tagged ‘Tom Fahey’

VAILLANCOURT RESPONDS TO UNION LEADER

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

February 11, 2010

To the Union Leader

To The Editor:

Your reporter Tom Fahey, who years ago physically assaulted me in the State House (it’s actually on video and is out there on the web somewhere) is wrong when he reports that I refused to discuss my campaign to defend free speech in the New Hampshire House with the Union Leader.

I did no such thing. In fact, I have been writing about this abuse of power by Speaker Terie Norelli and Local and Regulated Revenues Committee Chair Mary Beth Walz for the past two weeks. Publisher Joe W. McQuaid and editorial page director Drew Cline are among the first to get everything I write or say about it, and it’s been posted on redhampshire. I simply refuse to talk with someone who has a history of assault and who never apologized for it (he actually drew blood; and the only reason I didn’t press charges at the time is that I’m such a nice person). The fact that he approached me as I was leaving the State House yesterday with the sarcastic jibe,”Hey, Senator” is further evidence of his malignant intent.

Maybe it’s time Union Leader hires a reporter who doesn’t assault elected officials and then go out of his way to malign them at every opportunity.

Should you choose to run the whole truth behind the crusade to force Speaker Norelli to stop censoring people (totally new ground for a New Hampshire Speaker), you are welcome to print this as an op-ed piece, but then while I’ve had numerous op-ed pieces printed in papers throughout the state in recent years, Mssrs. McQauid and Cline have ignored everything I’ve written for citizens of my own home city. (While censorship is never acceptable from a House Speaker, it’s something we’ve sadly come to expect from your newspaper).

I didn’t enter into this crusade to defend basic liberties for my own benefit. The bill in question wasn’t mine but rather was that of a former Speaker, the current Republican leader, a Salem Rep elected in a 40,000 person district, and a State Senator who served two terms in the United State Congress). I stepped forward not only for them and the people who elected them but also for every member of any minority ever denied a voice, and I might add for Democrats who are sure to attain minority status (and thus risk being censored) next year. Rest assured, I will be just as passionate in defending their rights should a Republican Speaker be unwise enough to attempt to do what Norelli and Walz did.

Newspaper malice is often represented by the pictures used. That certainly is the case with the photo you chose to use of me on page one. It was obviously a file photo, sitting around for use when you wished to make me look bad. How do I know? Because I wasn’t wearing a white tie yesterday; in honor of Speaker Norelli’s tactics, I was wearing a specially purchased Mickey Mouse tie. My portrait is available on the House web site, but then that wouldn’t suit your malignant purposes.

Seldom have so many trees given their lives for such an inside baseball story, especially one so ineptly reported. The tactic of pulling things from consent calendar was something I learned 15 years ago at the feet of former leaders, not Republicans but Democrat masters Rick Trombley and Ray Buckley, so let’s not hear of Democratic complaints. I simply stored it in the back of my head to employ when an injustice was so great that the only option was to “go all in” in protest.

You won’t get away with blaming me for delaying the lyme vote. That could have been special ordered to the start of the calendar at any time. In fact, bill proponent Claudia Chase told me the reason such an attempt was not made is that since it involved an was an attempt to overturn a committee, she needed all the support she could get and didn’t want to alienate Democratic leadership by moving it up (more inside baseball). A good reporter would have known that, but Fahey is probably the most incompetent scribe ever to draw breath in the Don Tibbetts press room (he’s no Norma Love–Love that Norma!).

It was when I pointed out on the House floor that this all could have been settled at 10 a.m.that Democrats booed (the truth hurts!), not as your caption states, when I declared victory.

In fact, it was a victory for people who cherish free speech everywhere. After visiting Bebelplatz for a re-enactment of Josef Goebbels presiding over the burning of 2500 books in Berlin on May 20, 1933, I vowed never idly sit by while freedom of thought is trampled on. I will fight for free speech to my last breath, despite the slings and errors from a thug reporter like Fahey.

The German phrase I quoted on the House floor (from German philosopher Heinrich Heine) translates as, “Where books are burned, so too shall people burn.” Indeed, I have visited numerous sites in and around Berlin where people were literally burned. Another German phrase should serve as a cautionary tale for our times, “Nie Wieder!” Never again should decent people sit back and watch freedoms be trampled.

The Norellis, Faheys, would be petty despots, and newspaper thugs of the world may not heed the caution, but your readers are smart enough to. The good people of New Hampshire are smart enough to.

Sincerely,

Rep. Steve Vaillancourt

JEFF GOLEY — THE COVER UP CONTINUES

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

FORs (that would be “friends of Ray” as in the nefarious Ray Buckley)  Shira Schoenberg, John Distaso, Tom Fahey, and Kevin Landrigan continue to be complicit in the attempted theft of State Senate District 16 by the Democrats.

Jeff Goley is no fiscal conservative.   Not only has Goley voted for an income tax, he has also voted for a sales tax, death taxes, and higher interest and dividends taxes.  But one would never know that from reading today’s columns by Schoenberg, Fahey and Landrigan, as they willfully ignore information sent to their respective newspapers specifically identifying the vote where Goley voted for an income tax.

It is not just Goley’s fiscal record that is being covered up by the FORs.  Fortunately for the voters of District 16, this intrepid blogger has the records in issue.

PRESS RELEASE — JEFF GOLEY OUTED AS AN INCOME TAXER

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

The following press release was sent to the Concord Monitor, Manchester Union Leader and Nashua Telegraph.

The year was 1999.  The day was February 16.  And the bill before the House was HB 109.  An income tax bill.

The committee recommended ITL, which means inexpedient to legislate.  Thus, a yes vote was to kill the income tax, a no vote was to let it live to be voted upon another day.  One Jeff Goley of Manchester –yes, that would be the Jeff Goley who now wants to be the State Senator for District 16– voted NO.

Now Goley and the Democrats have spun and would try to spin this vote as merely a procedural vote and not on the substance of the income tax.  Poppycock.  When Scott Brown said he would be the 41st vote against Obamacare he was referring to the procedural vote that would allow a vote on Obamacare.  To say that Jeff Goley was not voting for an income tax in February 16, 1999 would be like saying that Scott Brown’s 41st vote against Obamacare would not be a vote against Obamacare.  Poppycock.

Of course, the Democrats haven’t had to spin Goley’s pro-income tax vote, because the liberal media has been covering Goley’s vote up.  More particularly, Shira Schoenberg, John Distaso, Tom Fahey, and Kevin Landrigan have just dutifully repeated Ray Buckley’s talking points that Goley is a fiscal conservative.

Not only has Goley voted for an income tax, he has also voted for a sales tax, death taxes, and higher interest and dividends taxes.  But one would never know that from reading Shira Schoenberg, John Distaso, Tom Fahey, and Kevin Landrigan.

Fortunately for the voters of District 16, the Ed Mosca Blog has outed Goley as a tax-and-spend liberal who supports an income tax. 

But there is even more on Goley’s record that needs to see the light of the day.  The question is whether the press will do its job, or whether it will again be up to the Ed Mosca Blog to do the press’ job for it.

JEFF GOLEY OUTED

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Tonight’s Ed Mosca show will out Jeff Goley as an income-taxer.  That is, the intrepid host will do the job that DiStaso, Fahey, Landrigan and Schoenberg won’t.  The day that Goley voted for the income tax and the bill number will be revealed.

In addition, the intrepid host –shouting to be heard over a jazz band playing in studio A, undoubtedly planted there by McQuiad and Cline to disrupt the intrepid host– will review SOTU:  including Obama’s disgraceful attempt to humiliate and intimidate certain Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

THE MASSIVE LEFT-WING MEDIA CONSPIRACY TO ELECT JEFF GOLEY

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”  — John Adams

And the fact of the matter, although one would never know it from reading the Concord Monitor, Union Leader or Nashua Telegraph, is that Jeff Goley voted for an income tax.  And on next week’s Ed Mosca Show, I will give you the date of the vote and the bill number.

Indeed, Jeff is a very taxing individual.  In addition to voting for the income tax, he has voted for a sales tax, the 18 percent death tax, and higher interest and dividend taxes.  So readers of Shira Schoenberg, John Distaso, Tom Fahey, and Kevin Landrigan, tune in and find out what they are not telling you.

TERRY’S CAMPAIGN STUNT ACTUALLY RAISES AN IMPORTANT QUESTION

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Yesterday’s Fahey column –yes, that would be the soon to be unembargoed Manchester Union Leader writer Tom Fahey– reports that State Senate candidate Terry Pfaff has called upon fellow candidates  Jeff Goley and David Boutin to resign their seats in the House, so that a special election to fill their seats can be held.

Pfaff’s silly suggestion actually raises a serious point.  Last I knew Pfaff was employed as a firefighter in Manchester.  Will he resign his position as a firefighter or at least recuse himself from all votes that could effect his compensation, if elected?  For example, arguably the biggest threat to the New Hampshire Advantage is the State Retirement, which is a defined benefit, rather than a defined contribution, type of pension.  Whose interest would Pfaff put first, in voting on the State Retirement, the taxpayer or his fellow firefighters?  And should a member of a government union even be voting on such legislation, when his own paycheck would be affected?

We already know that Jeff Goley does not see any ethical dilemma in voting on legislation involving government unions (that is when he does show up — I understand he  has the worst or one of the worst attendance rates of all Manchester reps).  Indeed, he is the Chairman of a House Committee that oversees labor law issues.

So how about it, Terry Pfaff, will you immediately resign your position as a firefighter (assuming, of course, you still hold that position), and if not, why not?

UNION LEADER RUNS UP THE WHITE FLAG

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

white.flagToday’s edition of the Manchester Union Leader (“MUL”) reports that starting this Thursday the Distaso, Fahey and Brooks columns will once again be free on-line.

Why the about-face?  It was only last month that Joe McQuaid announced wih great fanfare that these columns would henceforth only be available to paid readers.

Well, the MUL’s line is that these columns have been “paid for” by a sponsorship, namely the Chuck Douglas law firm.  But what does that mean?  Are Distaso’s et al.’s salaries being paid for by Douglas?  Or is Douglas simply paying for an advertisement?  Or is Douglas paying an amount equivalent to the number of new paid subscribers the MUL anticipated?

Clearly, if putting these columns behind a pay-wall had been generating a significant number of additional paid subscriptions the MUL would have kept the pay-wall up.  The MUL’s line that these columnists have now been “paid for” is face-saving spin.  The MUL’s about-face is about preventing Distaso et al from becoming irrelevancies.

TODAY’S TOM FAHEY COLUMN

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

Today’s State House Dome is one for the accountants.  Roughly one-half the column involves a tax deduction under the Business Profits Tax for “reasonable compensation” for proprietorships and partnerships.  Y-A-W-N.  Actually, it is an important  topic, but without some explanation of how the BPT works, it is strictly inside baseball.  So, Y-A-W-N.

If that is not enough for you green eye-shade types, Fahey also takes on the burning questions of when the State’s financial statements will be audited – Y-A-W-N – and the overdue business tax refunds — Y-A-W-N.

No juicy news on the race to fill Ted Gatsas’ senate seat.  Indeed, no news about it at all. 

Y-A-W-N.